Showing posts with label Resources. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Resources. Show all posts

AAC Awareness Month: More Than a Device, It’s a Way In




October is AAC Awareness Month, a time to celebrate the many ways people communicate beyond spoken words.  AAC—augmentative and alternative communication—includes gestures, facial expressions, sign language, picture boards, alphabet boards, tablets, and speech-generating devices.


AAC is not a “last resort,” a reward for trying hard enough to speak, or a shiny electronic object that lives permanently in a backpack.  It is access to language, connection, choice, learning, humor, self-advocacy, and the absolutely essential ability to say, “No,” when someone offers you an unwanted bite of casserole.


Why AAC Matters


For people who cannot consistently rely on speech to be understood, AAC can supplement or compensate for speech-language difficulties and support communication at home, school, in healthcare, and in the community.  It gives people ways to request, reject, greet, ask questions, comment, tell stories, share opinions, advocate for themselves, and participate in relationships.


That last part matters.  Every child deserves more than a way to request crackers or ask for a favorite video.  They deserve language for “That was funny,” “I am worried,” “I changed my mind,” “Leave me alone,” “Tell me more,” and “My sibling is being extremely suspicious.”


AAC can also reduce frustration by making communication more available in the moment.  When a child has thoughts, needs, jokes, questions, and big feelings but does not yet have a reliable way to express them, communication breakdowns can pile up quickly.  AAC helps build a bridge between what a person wants to say and the people who need to listen.


AAC Is Not Anti-Speech


One of the most persistent myths about AAC is that it will prevent a child from talking.  The evidence says otherwise: AAC can support, and in some cases increase, spoken-language development when used as part of a multimodal communication approach.


Think of AAC as adding ramps, not removing stairs.  If spoken language is available and useful, great—use it.  If speech is hard to access, inconsistent, tiring, unclear, or unavailable in a particular moment, AAC offers another route.


A child does not need to choose between speaking and using AAC.  Most people already communicate in multiple ways: talking, pointing, texting, waving, typing, using facial expressions, and occasionally communicating an entire paragraph through one very dramatic sigh.  AAC users deserve the same flexibility.


“But Are They Ready?”


The short answer is this: access comes before mastery.

Children do not need to prove that they are “ready” for AAC by demonstrating prerequisite skills such as matching pictures, sitting still, making eye contact, understanding every symbol, or producing a certain number of spoken words.  ASHA recommends considering AAC as early as possible when communication needs are present, and early AAC exposure can support language development and vocabulary growth.


We do not wait until a child can read before surrounding them with books.  We do not wait until a child can cook before letting them into the kitchen.  Similarly, we should not wait until a child has mastered communication before giving them access to communication tools.


What Counts as AAC?


AAC is much broader than a tablet with a voice.  People may use one communication method or a combination of methods, depending on the setting, their access needs, and what they want to say.


  • Unaided AAC: Communication that does not require materials or technology.
    • Examples include gestures, pointing, facial expressions, body language, signs, eye gaze, vocalizations, and meaningful movements.
    • These forms can be quick, natural, and available anywhere.
  • Low-tech AAC: Communication tools that do not require batteries or charging.
    • Examples include picture boards, core-word boards, visual schedules, communication books, paper-based choice boards, alphabet boards, and written messages.
    • Low-tech options are useful backups for high-tech systems and can be especially helpful during water play, travel, technology problems, or the dreaded “device battery at 2 percent” moment.
  • High-tech AAC: Electronic tools that may produce spoken messages.
    • Examples include speech-generating devices, tablets with AAC apps, dedicated communication devices, keyboard-based systems, and eye-gaze systems.
    • These systems can offer extensive vocabulary, personalized messages, voice output, literacy supports, and flexible ways to communicate across settings.
  • Multimodal communication: Using more than one communication method.
    • A child may speak, gesture, sign, point to pictures, type, and use a device—all in the same day or even the same conversation.
    • This is not confusion; it is communication flexibility.  Most people already communicate this way when they talk, text, point, wave, and use facial expressions.
  • AAC supports receptive language as well as expression.
    • Visual supports, symbols, schedules, and modeled words can help children understand routines, directions, choices, new vocabulary, and expectations.
    • Seeing and hearing language together can make communication more accessible.
  • AAC for expressive language: AAC gives people ways to share their own messages.
    • It can support requesting, refusing, commenting, asking questions, telling stories, participating in class, and connecting with others.
    • The goal isn’t simply for a child to press buttons correctly; it’s for them to communicate authentically.
  • AAC for literacy: Robust AAC systems can support reading and writing.
    • Access to letters, words, symbols, and language patterns can help children participate in literacy activities.
    • Children who use AAC deserve opportunities to explore books, write messages, spell words, and develop their own voice on the page and through speech.
  • AAC for self-advocacy: AAC can help people communicate needs, preferences, boundaries, and rights.
    • Useful messages include “I need a break,” “Please give me more time,” “I do not understand,” “Talk to me,” and “I said no.”
    • Self-advocacy is not an extra feature; it is one of the most important reasons communication access matters.

AAC can support language, literacy, participation, and communicative competence when communication partners consistently provide it and model it.


Beyond “I Want”


Requesting is useful.  Everyone should be able to ask for food, toys, breaks, music, and help.  But if AAC is only used for requests, it can become the communication equivalent of being handed a restaurant menu and told you may only order water.

Robust AAC should also support:

  • Protesting: “Stop,” “No,” “Not that,” “I don’t like it”
  • Social connection: “Hi,” “Look,” “Guess what,” “That’s silly”
  • Sharing opinions: “Awesome,” “Boring,” “Gross,” “I disagree”
  • Asking questions: “Where?” “Why?” “What happened?”
  • Learning: Answering, commenting, retelling, predicting, and participating in class
  • Self-advocacy: “I need more time,” “I do not understand,” “Please talk to me, not about me”
  • Emotional expression: “I’m nervous,” “I’m excited,” “I’m angry,” “I need a break”
  • Personality: Humor, sarcasm, storytelling, strong preferences, and perfectly timed side-eye

Communication isn’t just about meeting needs.  It is about being known.


What Parents Can Do


Parents do not need to become AAC experts overnight.  In fact, most effective AAC support happens through ordinary, repeated moments—not formal drills, flashcards, or lengthy “Say this before you get the cookie” negotiations.


Model, Don’t Quiz


Use the child’s communication system while you speak.  This is often called aided language input or AAC modeling.


If you are saying, “Let’s go outside,” touch or select “go” and “outside” on the AAC system.  If you are saying, “Wow, that was funny,” model “funny.” If your child looks like they are plotting to throw their broccoli, you might model “no,” “all done,” or “yucky.”


You do not need to model every word in a sentence.  Start with one or two meaningful words, then build over time.


Keep It Available


AAC cannot help if it is in the car, in a closet, charging in another room, or tucked safely away “so it does not get lost.” Keep the device or communication board available throughout the day, including during play, meals, schoolwork, outings, and conversations.


A device is not a reward.  It is not something a child earns after “good behavior.” It is their voice.


Honor Every Communication Attempt


Watch for gestures, body movements, signs, facial expressions, vocalizations, eye gaze, typed messages, pictures, and device selections.  Respond as though the child’s communication matters—because it does.


If a child pushes something away, pauses, reaches, looks toward an item, or uses a repeated sound, treat it as meaningful.  You can respond and model language: “You said no,” “You want more,” “You are looking at the bubbles,” or “You need help.”


Give Time


AAC communication often takes longer than speech.  After asking a question or making a comment, pause.  Resist the urge to fill the silence immediately.


A helpful rule of thumb: say less, wait more, and give the child a chance to respond in their own way.  The pause may feel long, but it creates space for communication instead of accidentally finishing every thought for them.


Include AAC in Real Life


Use AAC where life actually happens:

  • At breakfast: “More,” “all done,” “hot,” “banana,” “help”
  • During play: “Go,” “again,” “big,” “funny,” “my turn”
  • At the store: “Look,” “want,” “not that,” “where?”
  • At bedtime: “Book,” “tired,” “one more,” “tomorrow”
  • During hard moments: “Break,” “stop,” “help,” “mad,” “quiet”

The goal is not perfect performance.  The goal is repeated access to meaningful language.


Resources for Parents


Below are 15 resources parents can explore.  Some offer research and professional guidance; others provide practical ideas, advocacy tools, device support, or family-centered learning.


1.  American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)  

ASHA’s AAC practice portal explains what AAC is, who may benefit, and why people with communication needs should consider AAC early. It also highlights AAC’s potential role in language, literacy, and participation in communication.


2. ASHA Early Intervention AAC Resources  

This resource is especially helpful for families of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers.  It explains that families can introduce AAC early and that it does not hinder speech development.


3. HealthyChildren.org from the American Academy of Pediatrics 

The AAP’s parent-facing AAC guide explains that AAC can be used at any age, including infancy and toddlerhood, and encourages families to consult experienced SLPs and early-intervention providers.


4. CommunicationFIRST  

CommunicationFIRST centers communication access as a civil-rights issue and advocates for the autonomy, dignity, and rights of people who cannot rely on speech alone.


5. CommunicationFIRST Resource Library  

Families can explore materials on communication rights, accessible participation, advocacy, and practical guidance from AAC users and allies.


6. International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC)  

ISAAC offers international AAC information, awareness materials, and opportunities to learn from AAC users, families, researchers, and professionals.  AAC Awareness Month has been internationally recognized each October since 2007.


7. United States Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (USSAAC)  

USSAAC connects families and professionals to advocacy, awareness efforts, training, and AAC-focused events.  It is a useful starting point for finding national AAC community resources.


8. AAC Institute  

The AAC Institute provides education, research, and training related to AAC assessment and implementation.  Families may find its materials helpful when considering long-term communication support and participation.


9. AssistiveWare  

AssistiveWare offers practical AAC education, videos, articles, and parent-friendly strategies for modeling language and supporting communication in everyday routines.


10.  PRC-Saltillo  

PRC-Saltillo provides training, implementation resources, device information, and support materials for families and schools using robust AAC systems.


11.  Tobii Dynavox Learning Hub  

Families can find webinars, activities, training resources, and practical supports related to speech-generating devices, literacy, and AAC access.


12.  PrAACtical AAC  

PrAACtical AAC shares articles, implementation strategies, and free resources that help communication partners move beyond simple requesting toward richer language use.


13.  Jane Farrall Consulting  

This resource is particularly useful for families interested in robust AAC, literacy, vocabulary access, and supporting language beyond basic choice-making.


14.  Closing the Gap  

Closing the Gap offers information about assistive technology, AAC tools, webinars, and products.  It can help families compare technology options or learn about broader access supports.


15.  A Local AAC-Specialized Speech-Language Pathologist or AAC Team  

A knowledgeable speech-language pathologist can help identify communication strengths, evaluate access needs, trial systems, train communication partners, and collaborate with schools.  The AAP specifically recommends consulting professionals with AAC experience when a child is having difficulty communicating.


Questions to Ask a Team


When talking with a Speech-Language Pathologist, school team, early-intervention provider, or AAC consultant, parents may find these questions useful:

  • What communication strengths is my child already showing?
  • What does my child need to communicate that they cannot reliably communicate now?
  • Can we trial more than one AAC option?
  • Does the system include words for commenting, protesting, asking questions, socializing, and learning—not only requesting?
  • How will my child access the system: touch, eye gaze, switches, keyguard, partner-assisted scanning, or another method?
  • How will adults model and support AAC at home and school?
  • What vocabulary will be available for classroom learning, play, routines, and relationships?
  • How will AAC support literacy development?
  • What happens if the device is damaged, lost, or not available?
  • How will we measure progress without limiting communication to a checklist of requests?

These questions shift the conversation from “Can they use it?” to the more important question: “What supports will help them communicate most effectively?”


A Better Way to Think About AAC

AAC is not a test of intelligence.  It doesn’t prove that someone has “failed” at speech.  It is not an obstacle to connection.


AAC is a tool for access.


It gives a child more ways to say what they think, feel, know, want, reject, remember, imagine, and dream.  It gives families more chances to hear their child’s personality.  It gives educators more ways to include a student in real learning.  It gives communities a chance to listen better.


This AAC Awareness Month, let’s make one commitment: keep communication available, presume competence, model real language, and remember that every person has something worth saying.

Co‑Teaching Models in Special/General Education Partnerships — Fidelity, Staffing, and Outcome Evidence

Co‑teaching is less a magic spell and more a duet: two professionals intentionally sharing the stage so every student gets the spotlight.  When done well, it increases access, raises expectations, and reduces dependence on pull-out.  Done poorly, it’s two adults in a room doing parallel solo acts.  Here’s a practical, evidence‑minded playbook for making co‑teaching sing — with clear fidelity markers, staffing options, and the outcome evidence you need to justify the rehearsal schedule.

“Co‑teaching: where collaboration meets curriculum — or just doubles the chairs.”

Quick Primer — The Common Models

  • One Teach / One Assist: The primary instructor leads while the partner circulates to check and provide support.  High efficiency; low parity if overused.
  • Station Teaching: Students rotate through teacher‑led stations.  Great for differentiation and small‑group intensity.
  • Parallel Teaching: The class splits, and both teachers deliver the same lesson to smaller groups. Best for increasing participation and reducing the student‑teacher ratio.
  • Alternate Teaching: One teacher handles the large-group lesson while the other pulls a small group for pre‑teach or remediation.  Use sparingly and purposefully.
  • Team Teaching: Both teachers share instruction equally in a seamless, back‑and‑forth delivery.  Highest demand for collaboration but rich in modeling inclusive practices.

Fidelity — How to Know It’s Authentic Co‑Teaching (Checklist)

  • Shared Planning Time: 30–60 minutes/week minimum built into the schedule for co‑planning.
  • Intentional Role Assignment: Each lesson has written roles and objectives for both teachers.
  • Use of Multiple Models: Classrooms shift models across the week based on goals (not one model by default).
  • Joint Assessment & Grading: Both educators contribute to formative checks, progress monitoring, and report card input.
  • Observed Collaboration Behaviors: Walkthrough rubric shows evidence of joint instruction, shared language, and coordinated routines.
  • Student Access Metrics: IEPs and participation logs show students with disabilities receive instruction in the general curriculum, not just proximity.
  • Professional Reflection Cycle: Regular co‑reflection and coaching cycles with artifacts (lesson plans, videos, student work).

Measure fidelity with a short rubric (examples of items): co‑planning present, dual instruction observed, shared assessment use, adaptive materials offered, roles documented.  Score weekly/biweekly and pair with coaching.

Staffing — Pragmatic Models and Tradeoffs

  • Fully Funded Co‑Teacher (one general + one special): Highest fidelity potential.  Pros: parity, continuity.  Cons: staffing cost.
  • Push‑In Specialist Rotation: One special educator supports several classrooms across the day.  Pros: broader coverage; Cons: weaker co‑planning and relationship depth.
  • Para‑Supported Co‑Teaching: Certified general teacher + highly trained paraeducator as instructional partner.  Pros: cost-effective; Cons: requires strong para training and clear role boundaries.
  • Itinerant Model with Cluster Grouping: Students with higher needs are clustered to a few classrooms where co‑teaching is prioritized.Pros: concentrates expertise.  Cons: may limit full schoolwide exposure.
  • Hybrid Schedules: Combine full co‑teaching for core instruction and specialist pull-out for intensive skill work.   Pros: balanced; Cons: requires disciplined scheduling to avoid over‑segregation.

Staffing decisions should align with student needs, available certifications, union agreements, and the budget. Whichever model is chosen, invest in role clarity and protected planning time.

Instructional Practices That Maximize Impact

  • Start with UDL (Universal Design for Learning) to reduce barriers for everyone.
  • Embed brief in‑class interventions (5–15 minute targeted groups) rather than default pull-out.
  • Use formative assessment every lesson; partition groups dynamically based on quick probes.
  • Train peers in peer‑mediated supports so social access is an instructional priority.
  • Adopt shared behavior systems with consistent reinforcement across staff.

Outcome Evidence — What The Research Shows 

  • Co‑teaching increases access to the general curriculum and opportunities for peer interaction when implemented with fidelity.
  • Students with disabilities in inclusive, co‑taught settings often show improved academic engagement and social outcomes compared with long‑term segregated placements.
  • Academic gains in the literature are mixed when co‑teaching is poorly implemented — the presence of two adults alone does not guarantee learning gains.
  • Key moderators of positive outcomes: high‑quality co‑planning, shared instructional responsibility, use of evidence‑based interventions, and progress monitoring.

In Short: co‑teaching is promising, but its effectiveness is tightly coupled to how faithfully and intelligently it is executed.

Costs, Sustainability, and Policy Levers

  • Budget for protected co‑planning time, coaching, and substitute coverage.
  • Build co‑teaching expectations into job descriptions and performance evaluations.
  • Use schedules and master‑planning to avoid last‑minute pull-outs that undermine inclusion.
  • Advocate for district policy that values and funds co‑teaching as a core instructional design, not an add‑on.

Quick Fidelity Rubric

Rate 1–4 on each:

  1. Protected co‑planning time scheduled and used.
  2. Lesson plans list explicit shared roles/objectives.
  3. Two or more co‑teaching models used weekly.
  4. Evidence of joint assessment and grading.
  5. Student access to general curriculum documented.

Target average: 3+ for strong fidelity.

Resources (Practical Starting Points)

  • Universal Design for Learning (CAST) — practical UDL guidelines and lesson templates.
  • Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) guidance and briefs on inclusion and service delivery.
  • What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) — reviews of interventions and inclusive practice evidence.
  • Co‑teaching implementation guides and rubrics from state education departments and university centers (search for “co‑teaching rubric” + your state for ready tools).
  • Professional learning: coaching models that pair lesson study and video reflection for co‑teaching teams.

(These are well‑established starting points to locate rubrics, fidelity tools, and evidence summaries.)

Bottom Line — The Three Things That Matter

  1. Planning Time — without it, co‑teaching collapses into two adults doing different jobs.
  2. Role Parity and Shared Assessment — co‑teaching succeeds when both professionals share ownership of student outcomes.
  3. Data + Coaching — continuous monitoring and instructional coaching turn intent into improved student access.

Co‑teaching isn’t cheaper or easier than segregated models — it’s smarter.  When done with fidelity, backed by appropriate staffing, and anchored in evidence‑based practice, it delivers real inclusion: not just bodies in a room, but learning, belonging, and measurable outcomes for all students.



Implementation of Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) in Inclusive Classrooms — Practical Strategies and Evidence for Meaningful Access

Inclusive classrooms are where children belong, learn, and grow together — not where supports are an afterthought.  The principle of Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) isn’t a checkbox or a slogan: it’s a legal and moral commitment to give students with disabilities meaningful access to the general curriculum alongside their peers.  Below are clear, practical strategies educators and leaders can use to make LRE real — plus the evidence and resources to back them up.

What LRE Really Means

  • LRE requires that students with disabilities are educated with nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate.
  • “Maximum extent appropriate” is individualized: some students will need more support in the general classroom; others require brief pull-out for specific skills.
  • The goal: access to the general curriculum, social development, and participation — not mere physical presence.

Why Inclusion + LRE Matters (Evidence-Informed)

  • Inclusion supports academic and social outcomes when paired with evidence-based instruction and supports.
  • Students in inclusive settings benefit from peer models, higher expectations, and expanded opportunities to generalize skills.
  • For many students, exclusionary placements increase isolation and reduce long-term access to community, work, and adult supports.

(These conclusions are supported by multiple systematic reviews and position statements from major education organizations advocating inclusive practice and individualized supports.)

Five Practical Classroom Strategies That Make LRE Work

  1. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as the baseline

    • Provide multiple means of representation, action & expression, and engagement.
    • Example: Offer text, audio, and visual versions of reading material and let students choose how to demonstrate learning.
  2. High-quality differentiated instruction

    • Start lessons with core standards, then tier tasks: on-grade-level core tasks, scaffolded supports, and extension options.
    • Use common formative assessments to quickly group students for targeted instruction.
  3. Embedded, evidence-based interventions (not just pull-out)

    • Use brief, in-class small-group lessons for skill gaps (e.g., phonics boosts, math number talks) rather than removing students entirely.
    • Monitor progress with short probes twice a week; adjust interventions rapidly.
  4. Co-teaching and collaborative practices

    • Models: One teach/one assist, Station Teaching, Parallel Teaching, Team Teaching.  Rotate models based on lesson goals.
    • Plan together weekly; share grading, behavior tracking, and parent communication.
  5. Natural supports, peer-mediated instruction, and scaffolds

    • Train peer buddies to practice social skills and complete cooperative tasks.
    • Use visual schedules, checklists, sentence starters, and strategic seating to reduce barriers.

Classroom Routines and Tools That Reduce Restrictive Practices

  • Structured transitions and predictable schedules.
  • Behavior plans that emphasize teaching replacement skills and environmental changes before removal.
  • Assistive technology for access (text-to-speech, alternative response modes).
  • Quick-teach mini-lessons embedded into the class (5–10 minutes) to address specific IEP goals.

Assessment and Decision-Making To Keep Placements Lawful and Meaningful

  • Use data-driven IEP meetings: present baseline data and progress-monitoring graphs, and document attempted classroom accommodations before considering a more restrictive placement.
  • Document time and outcomes for all in-class supports.
  • Revisit placement decisions regularly; LRE is dynamic, not permanent.

Building Systems That Sustain LRE Across a School

  • Leadership: principal and special education director visibly prioritize inclusion through schedule design and resource allocation.
  • Professional learning: regular coaching cycles, peer observations, and co-planning time.
  • Scheduling: build common planning time and co-teaching pairs into the master schedule.
  • Family partnership: invite families to participate in planning, explain accommodations, and set shared goals for access to the general curriculum.

Addressing Common Pushbacks (And How to Answer Them)

  • “Some students need separate classes.” — Response: Some do for short periods, but data should drive that decision and show what skills are being built to return the student to the classroom.
  • “Teachers don’t have time.” — Response: Reallocate planning time, use coaching to build efficiency, and prioritize high-leverage strategies (UDL + brief in-class interventions).
  • “It hurts other students.” — Response: With well-designed differentiation and positive classroom culture, inclusion often improves outcomes for all students.

Quick Implementation Checklist (Ready-to-Use)

  • Audit: Do students with IEPs have daily access to core instruction?
  • Train: Provide a 3‑session UDL + co-teaching starter series for staff.
  • Schedule: Create 45–60 minutes/week of common planning for each co-teaching pair.
  • Monitor: Pick 3 progress-monitoring probes aligned with IEP goals and collect them weekly.
  • Family: Hold an LRE-focused IEP meeting that opens with strengths and access goals.

Evidence & Further Resources (Practical Starting Points)

(For a school or district starting this work, these are the right places to begin exploration and to locate implementation tools, rubrics, and fidelity checklists.)

Final Note — A Tiny Manifesto

Inclusion guided by LRE is not charity; it’s rigorous teaching plus respectful design.  It asks educators to be clever, not comfortable — to build classrooms that flex around learners rather than forcing them into rigid boxes.  When schools commit to UDL, co-teaching, frequent progress monitoring, and strong family partnerships, LRE stops being a legal line on a page and becomes classrooms that actually belong to every child.  That’s justice with lesson plans.

THIS JUST DROPPED

Before the Holiday Break: A Parent’s Guide to Protecting Routines, Regulation, and Communication

Holiday break is often marketed as a magical season of twinkling lights, joyful traditions, matching pajamas, and children who willingly pos...